Elon Musk NEW Light Speed Helical Engine. Take A Look?

USA & Elon Musk’s NEW Light Speed Helical Engine. Take A First Look?:- NASA’s and Elon Musk NEW Helical Engine that Breaks the Laws of Physics Intro According to Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, the only thing that is faster than the speed of light is the expansion of the universe.

This means that the universe is expanding at an incredible rate making it almost impossible to explore it in its entirety. Thus far, humanity has depended on traditional methods of propulsion which have allowed us to explore some parts of our solar system.

NASA’s & Elon Musk Design Of A Helical Engine

However, if we wish to go beyond our galactic neighborhood, we must find a way to travel faster in the vacuum of space. The latest reports suggest that NASA has finally perfected the design of a Helical engine that breaks the laws of physics, let’s take a closer look.

Warp Drives The closest star to Earth is Proxima Centauri. It is about 4.25 light-years away or about 25 trillion miles. The fastest ever spacecraft, the now-in-space Parker Solar Probe will reach a top speed of 450,000 mph.

It would take just 20 seconds to go from Los Angeles to New York City at that speed, but it would take the solar probe about 6,633 years to reach Earth’s nearest neighboring solar system. If humanity ever wants to travel easily between stars, people will need to go faster than light.

But so far, faster-than-light travel is possible only in science fiction. In Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series, humanity can travel from planet to planet, star to star, or across the universe using jump drives.

We have all read many such stories in our youth, and these same stories are what inspire scientists today to find alternative ways humanity can travel in space. Some characters – like the astronauts in the movies “Interstellar” and “Thor” – use wormholes to travel between solar systems in seconds.

Another approach – familiar to “Star Trek” fans – is warp drive technology. Warp drives are theoretically possible if still far-fetched technology. Two recent papers made headlines when researchers claimed to have overcome one of the many challenges that stand between the theory of warp drives and reality. But how do these theoretical warp drives work?

To set yourself in motion, you’ve got to push off of one thing. Your feet push off of the bottom, airplanes push themselves off of the air, and rockets push components of themselves out the rear finish to form them continue. however the EmDrive does not.

AN EM drive

It’s simply a box with microwaves within it, bouncing around. And purportedly it will but, for example you’ll somehow compress the house between you and purpose B so the interval is currently only 1 meter. Then, moving through spacetime at your most speed of 1 meter per second, you’d be able to reach purpose B in concerning one second.

In theory, this approach doesn’t contradict the laws of relativity theory since you’re not moving quicker than lightweight within the house around you. Alcubierre showed that the warp drive from “Star Trek” was on paper potential.

Sadly, Alcubierre’s methodology of pressure frame of reference had one problem: it needs negative energy or negative mass. A negative Energy drawback Alcubierre’s warp drive would work by making a bubble of flat spacetime round the ballistic capsule and sinuous spacetime around that bubble to scale back distances.

The warp drive would need either negative mass – a theorized form of matter – or a hoop of negative energy density to figure. Physicists have not ascertained negative mass, so leaves negative energy because the solely possibility.

Option to make negative energy, a warp drive would use an enormous quantity of mass to make AN imbalance between particles and antiparticles. as an example, if AN lepton ANd an antilepton seem close to the warp drive, one in every of the particles would get unfree by the mass ANd this ends up in an imbalance.

This imbalance ends up in negative energy density. Alcubierre’s warp drive would use this negative energy to make the spacetime bubble. This resolution, though, doesn’t turn out a warp drive that may go quicker than lightweight. severally, Lentz additionally projected an answer that doesn’t need negative energy.

He used a unique geometric approach to unravel the equations of relativity theory, and by doing therefore, he found that a warp drive wouldn’t ought to use negative energy. Lentz’s resolution would enable the bubble to travel quicker than the speed of sunshine.

It’s essential to entails that these exciting developments ar mathematical models. The scientific community won’t totally trust these models till there’s experimental proof. Yet, the science of warp drives is returning into read. Innovative thinking on this subject is crucial to creating the dream of heavenly body travel a reality.

Within the words of Captain Picard, things ar solely not possible till they’re not. EM Drive Another recently projected methodology that would solve the matter is AN EM drive. the look claims to form the {impossible|not potential} possible.

It uses a way of pushing space vehicle around while not the requirement for propulsion or AN exhaust. however the EmDrive does not simply violate our basic understanding of the universe; the experiments that claim to live an impact haven’t been replicated.

It goes by varied names — the EmDrive, the Q-Drive, the RF Resonant Cavity, the not possible Drive — however all the incarnations of the device claim to try to to constant thing: bounce some radiation around within a closed chamber, and you’ll be able to get propulsion.

Conservation Of Momentum

This is often a giant deal as a result of all types of engineering science need conservation of momentum. move. Explanations for a way the EmDrive may work go past the boundaries of acknowledged physics. maybe it’s somehow interacting with the quantum vacuum energy of frame of reference.

Maybe our understanding of momentum is broken. maybe it’s some new physics, publicized by the EmDrive experiments. Conservation of momentum is pretty straightforward: during a closed system, you’ll be able to add up the momentum of all the objects in this system, Then they move.

Then you add up the momenta of all the objects once more. the entire momentum at the start should equal the entire momentum at the tip, this implies that momentum is preserved. The idea of the conservation of momentum has been with US for hundreds of years.

It’s even understood by Newton’s illustrious second law, however within the early decade, it gained a replacement standing.

The good scientist Emmy Noether verified that conservation of momentum beside alternative conservation laws, like conservation of energy, may be a reflection of the very fact that our universe has sure symmetries. as an example, you’ll be able to opt for an appropriate location to perform a physics experiment.

You’ll be able to then develop your physics experiment, transport it to anyplace within the universe and repeat it. As long as you account for environmental variations, say, completely different air pressures or gravitative fields, your results are going to be identical.

This is often a symmetry of nature: physics does not care concerning wherever experiments happen. mathematician accomplished that this symmetry of house directly results in the conservation of momentum.

You can’t have one while not the opposite. So, if the EmDrive demonstrates a violation of momentum conservation that it claims to try and do, then this basic symmetry of nature should be broken.

However, nearly every single physical theory, from Newton’s laws to quantum theory, expresses area symmetry and momentum conservation in their base equations. Indeed, most up-to-date theories of physics square measure merely sophisticated restatements of momentum conservation.

To seek out a crack during this symmetry would not simply be associate degree extension of acknowledged physics — it’d fully upend centuries of understanding of however the universe works. that is never not possible, scientific revolutions have happened before, however it’s progressing to take plenty of convincing to create that happen.

And also the experiments to date haven’t been all that satisfying. Ever since the introduction of the EmDrive construct in 2001, each few years a bunch claims to possess measured a internet force returning from its device. However these researchers square measure mensuration associate degree improbably little effect: a force thus little it could not even budge a chunk of paper.

This results in vital applied mathematics uncertainty and measuring error. Indeed, of all the printed results, none have created a measuring on the far side “barely qualifying for publication,” including something vital. Still, alternative teams have developed their own EM Drives, making an attempt to copy the results, pretty much as good scientists ought to.

Those replication tries either fail to live something in any respect or realize some unsupportive variable that may simply justify the measured meager results, just like the interaction of the cabling within the device with the Earth’s field.

The voluted Engine fortunately, one amongst the largest traits of humanity is our drive to seek out solutions to troublesome issues. And this is often what National Aeronautics and Space Administration mortal David Burns has been doing in his spare time.

Unfazed by the failures of the EM Drive, he has created associate degree engine construct that he says may in theory accelerate to ninety nine p.c of the speed of sunshine – all while not mistreatment propellant.

On paper, his style works by exploiting the method mass will amendment at relativistic speeds – those about to the speed of sunshine in a very vacuum. it’s not nevertheless been reviewed by associate degree skilled. clearly this paper has caused buzz approaching levels seen within the period of the EM Drive.

And yes, even some headlines claim the engine may violate the laws of physics. however whereas this idea is fascinating, it isn’t progressing to break physics anytime before long.

As {a thought|an idea|a construct|a plan|an inspiration} experiment to clarify his concept, Burns describes a box with a weight within, rib on a line, with a spring at every finish bouncing the load back and forth in a very vacuum – like area – the impact of this might be to wiggle the whole box, with the load superficial to face still.

Overall, the box would keep wriggly within the same spot – however if the mass of the load were to extend in exactly one direction, it’d generate a bigger push therein direction, and thus thrust. consistent with the principle of the conservation of momentum – within which the momentum of a system remains constant within the absence of any external forces – this could be not fully attainable.

However, there’s a loophole. consistent with special theory of relativity, objects gain mass as they approach speed of light. So, if you replace the load with ions and also the box with a loop, you’ll be able to in theory have the ions moving quicker at one finish of the loop, and slower at the opposite. however Burns’ drive is not one closed-loop system.

It’s voluted, sort of a stretched-out spring – thence “helical engine“. The engine accelerates ions confined in a very loop to moderate relativistic speeds so varies their speed to create slight changes to their mass. The engine then moves ions back and forth on the direction of visit turn out thrust.

The engine has no moving elements aside from ions traveling in a very vacuum line, cornered within electrical and magnetic fields. whereas the construct sounds attention-grabbing in theory, it comes with vital sensible issues.

One such drawback is that the voluted chamber would have to be compelled to be pretty massive, around 656 feet long and forty feet in diameter, to be precise. And it’d have to be compelled to generate a hundred sixty five megawatts of energy to supply one newton of thrust.

That is the resembling the output of an influence station to supply the force needed to accelerate a metric weight unit of mass per second square. So, plenty of input for a weensy little output. it’s inefficient however within the vacuum of area, it simply would possibly work.

Burns believes that the engine itself would be ready to get to ninety nine p.c the speed of sunshine if you had enough time and power. Burns notes the potency drawback in his presentation, and conjointly adds that his work hasn’t been reviewed by specialists, and there could also be errors in his mathematics.

We do not precisely have the blueprints for a completely purposeful spacefaring engine here. What we tend to do have may be a piece of groundwork that would be wont to develop such associate degree engine. What we’ve may be a dream of the celebs.


USA & Elon Musk’s NEW Light Speed Helical Engine. Take A First Look?

Read More:-

Leave a Comment